|
|
|
|
|
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 4, 2009 |
<Previous |
Next> |
| | A Reputational Theory of Two-Party Competition
Tasos Kalandrakis
SUGGESTED CITATION: Tasos Kalandrakis
(2009) "A Reputational Theory of Two-Party Competition",
Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 4:No
4, pp 343-378.
http:/dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00008047 |
Download this article
Tell a Colleague
Get
Acrobat Reader Printing Tip: Select the option to 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog to ensure the article prints as it appears on screen.
Learn more... |
I study a dynamic game of two-party competition in which party preferences are private information, exhibit serial correlation, and change with higher probability following defeat in elections. Assuming partisans care sufficiently about office, extreme policies are pursued with positive probability by the government when (a) both parties have a reputation for being extreme that exceeds a fixed level, and (b) elections are close in that both parties have similar reputations. Two qualitatively different equilibrium dynamics are possible depending on the speed with which the latent preferences of parties in government shift between moderation and extremism relative to the opposition. One dynamic produces regular government turnover and extreme policies along the path of play, whereas the other involves a strong incumbency advantage and moderate policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forthcoming articles
| Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress Shigeo Hirano, James M. Snyder, Jr., Stephen Ansolabehere, and John Mark Hansen |
|
Content Notification
Join our
email notification list to
receive alerts of published papers.
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©2005 now publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
|